The Jutland Controversy

From The Dreadnought Project
Revision as of 16:13, 18 September 2010 by Simon Harley (talk | contribs) (Created Page.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

The Jutland Controversy is a general term which can be applied to the debate in British naval, public, and later historical, circles, surrounding the Battle of Jutland in 1916.

Logs

In the Fair Signal Log (apparently since destroyed)[1] was a disclaimer at 16:55:

4.55 p.m.—Most of the records of the outgoing visual signals were lost and destroyed in the action. The records had been sent down to the Port Signal Station to be logged, but, on account of bursting shells and smoke and fire, they got lost or destroyed. This log was preserved with difficulty, not before a hose had been turned on it.[2]

It has been suggested by Andrew Gordon that the Rough Signal Log, far from being lost due by accident or enemy action, was deliberately lost in order to divest the flagship of responsibility for the delayed turn of the Fifth battle Squadron around 17:00.[3]

Footnotes

  1. Gordon. Rules. p. 636.
  2. Quoted in the Harper Record. p. 24.
  3. Gordon. Rules. pp. 139-140.

Bibliography