Difference between revisions of "History of the Royal Navy"

From The Dreadnought Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reference List)
(Oops.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Submarines==
 +
As recently as 2010, one historian has claimed that the Admiralty "studiously ignored the submarines for years" and had been "wont to ignore as dismiss as wasteful tinkering the underwater designs of inventors all over the world."<ref>Breemer.  ''Defeating the Submarine''.  pp. 5, 7.</ref>  Such generalised slurs ignore the facts.
 +
 
==Footnotes==
 
==Footnotes==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 06:54, 18 December 2010

Submarines

As recently as 2010, one historian has claimed that the Admiralty "studiously ignored the submarines for years" and had been "wont to ignore as dismiss as wasteful tinkering the underwater designs of inventors all over the world."[1] Such generalised slurs ignore the facts.

Footnotes

  1. Breemer. Defeating the Submarine. pp. 5, 7.

Bibliography