Difference between revisions of "Douglas Austin Gamble"
From The Dreadnought Project
Simon Harley (Talk | contribs) (→Great War) |
Simon Harley (Talk | contribs) (→Great War) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
An officer on Gamble's staff, [[Bertram Home Ramsay|Bertram H. Ramsay]], noted in his diary: | An officer on Gamble's staff, [[Bertram Home Ramsay|Bertram H. Ramsay]], noted in his diary: | ||
| − | + | <blockquote>The Vice-Admiral and I had a set-to in his cabin about my shortness of manner at times and the War College training which he resents very much, or rather the way in which I display it. Anyhow it cleared the air and had to come … My faults are that I can't sit still and see things done in an antiquated and un-progressive way, and I must put my word in … He won't admit that a knowledge of war is the least necessary for any officers until they come to flag rank, but how they are to learn it then I don't know … Whatever the result of the war may be, it can but do good by washing out these old-fashioned ideas and bringing forward an up-to-date officers' training. At present the old school will not admit that anyone junior to them can have any ideas at all.<ref name=Chalmers21>Quoted in Chalmers. ''Full Cycle''. p. 21.</ref></blockquote> | |
Upon the loss of the cruisers ''Aboukir'', ''Cressy'' and ''Hogue'' on 23 September, 1914, Ramsay wrote in his diary: | Upon the loss of the cruisers ''Aboukir'', ''Cressy'' and ''Hogue'' on 23 September, 1914, Ramsay wrote in his diary: | ||
| − | + | <blockquote>One ship was sunk by a submarine and the other stupid ships went to her assistance, simply asking to be sunk too. It does seem childish and just shows how utterly without imagination the majority of our senior officers are. About a month ago I remarked at lunch that I supposed it was recognised that if a ship of the Fleet got hit by a submarine, she could expect no assistance from other ships. The Vice-Admiral said that I was too bloodthirsty and pessimistic for anything, and why should I always be thinking of the worst side of things?<ref name=Chalmers21/></blockquote> | |
On 26 April, 1917, Gamble was promoted to the rank of {{AdmRN}}.<ref>''London Gazette'': [http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/30037/pages/3955 no. 30037. p. 3955.] 27 April, 1917.</ref> | On 26 April, 1917, Gamble was promoted to the rank of {{AdmRN}}.<ref>''London Gazette'': [http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/30037/pages/3955 no. 30037. p. 3955.] 27 April, 1917.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 23 December 2010
Admiral SIR Douglas Austin Gamble, K.C.V.O., Royal Navy (8 November, 1856 – 23 May, 1934) was an officer of the Royal Navy.
Life & Career
Gamble was promoted to the rank of Vice-Admiral on 8 December, 1913, vice Paget.[1]
Great War
An officer on Gamble's staff, Bertram H. Ramsay, noted in his diary:
The Vice-Admiral and I had a set-to in his cabin about my shortness of manner at times and the War College training which he resents very much, or rather the way in which I display it. Anyhow it cleared the air and had to come … My faults are that I can't sit still and see things done in an antiquated and un-progressive way, and I must put my word in … He won't admit that a knowledge of war is the least necessary for any officers until they come to flag rank, but how they are to learn it then I don't know … Whatever the result of the war may be, it can but do good by washing out these old-fashioned ideas and bringing forward an up-to-date officers' training. At present the old school will not admit that anyone junior to them can have any ideas at all.[2]
Upon the loss of the cruisers Aboukir, Cressy and Hogue on 23 September, 1914, Ramsay wrote in his diary:
One ship was sunk by a submarine and the other stupid ships went to her assistance, simply asking to be sunk too. It does seem childish and just shows how utterly without imagination the majority of our senior officers are. About a month ago I remarked at lunch that I supposed it was recognised that if a ship of the Fleet got hit by a submarine, she could expect no assistance from other ships. The Vice-Admiral said that I was too bloodthirsty and pessimistic for anything, and why should I always be thinking of the worst side of things?[2]
On 26 April, 1917, Gamble was promoted to the rank of Admiral.[3]
Supersession
Footnotes
- ↑ London Gazette: no. 28780. p. 9083. 9 December, 1913.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Quoted in Chalmers. Full Cycle. p. 21.
- ↑ London Gazette: no. 30037. p. 3955. 27 April, 1917.
Bibliography
- "Admiral Sir Douglas Gamble" (Obituaries). The Times. Thursday, 24 May, 1934. Issue 46762, col A, pg. 17.
Service Records
- The National Archives. ADM 196/38.
- The National Archives. ADM 196/19.
| Naval Office | ||
| Preceded by Sir Charles John Briggs |
Vice-Admiral Commanding, Fourth Battle Squadron 1914 – 1915 |
Succeeded by Sir Doveton Sturdee |
Categories:
- 1856 births
- 1934 deaths
- Personalities
- H.M.S. Britannia (Training Ship) Entrants of January, 1870
- Royal Navy Torpedo Officers
- Commanding Officers of H.M.S. Hyacinth (1898)
- Commanding Officers of H.M.S. Kent (1901)
- Commanding Officers of H.M.S. Canopus (1897)
- Commanding Officers of H.M.S. Vernon (Torpedo Training School)
- Rear-Admirals Commanding, Sixth Cruiser Squadron (Royal Navy)
- Vice-Admirals Commanding, Fourth Battle Squadron (Royal Navy)
- Royal Navy Admirals
- Royal Navy Flag Officers
